OBVIOUSLY one doesn't know the full context and all the small legalities of the moment.
BUT ON ITS FACE, this does not leave one with a good feeling.
STILL: DID WE REALLY NEED the guy dressed up like a pea pod?
That is all.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
Well that's frightening. The idea that she's trespassing if she has the sign but is NOT trespassing if she gets rid of it seems to me to be a very strange definition of "trespassing".
Have we returned to the point of signing "loyalty agreements" in order to get into a campaign rally? I thought McCain was trying to sound LESS like GWB, not MORE.
That woman was clearly a terrorist threat. Didn't you see her suicide patchwork garment?
krugman: mccain's "the fundamentals of the economy are strong" reaches herbert hoover levels of denial.
HOOVER!!
ok, slight amendment to my earlier comment. i didn't realize that krugman compared mccain to hoover BECAUSE MCCAIN IS ACTUALLY QUOTING HOOVER DURING THE DEPRESSION.
herbert hoover, 1931: "the economy is fundamentally strong."
john mccain, 2008: "the fundamentals of the economy are strong."
i mean, did we just win this thing?
Well, duh. Everyone knows that the correct political equation operator is "==", not "=".
This is not politics. It is clearly debugging.
Wow, Frightening is an understatement! That is downright scary!
Jiff
http://www.anonweb.eu.tc
Post a Comment